Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Azorius Control | ivc | 5-0 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Last Chance #12761383 |
| Azorius Control | soto_ | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Esper Pixie | msmayer | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Azorius Flash | predatorstyle | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Azorius Control | theslickshotgang | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Azorius Aggro , Azorius Artifacts , Azorius Auras , Azorius Bounce , Azorius Control , Azorius Enchantments , Azorius Flash , Azorius Glyph , Azorius Omniscience
Meta Performance Analysis
No More Lies ranks #159 out of approximately 339 cards in raw efficiency (top 47%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Multi average: 49.1%
Performance compared to other Multi cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, No More Lies is a decent card with average performance in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 13.51 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 2 mana, the average win rate in the format is 69.7%. No More Lies has a win rate of 67.6%, making it 3.0% worse than other 2-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Essence Scatter | Instant | 12 | 81.9% | 5 |
| Scorching Dragonfire | Instant | 13 | 78.1% | 6 |
| Sunpearl Kirin | Creature — Kirin | 9 | 76.2% | 6 |
| Urabrask's Forge | Artifact | 9 | 73.6% | 4 |
| Ajani, Caller of the Pride | Legendary Planeswalker — Ajani | 18 | 69.6% | 4 |
| Raise the Past | Sorcery | 18 | 68.7% | 5 |
| Dreams of Steel and Oil | Sorcery | 24 | 68.2% | 13 |
| Unsummon | Instant | 16 | 66.8% | 7 |
| Protect the Negotiators | Instant | 25 | 66.5% | 7 |
| Fabrication Foundry | Artifact | 6 | 65.5% | 2 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with No More Lies than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Preacher of the Schism | Creature — Vampire Cleric | 3 | 7 | 78.3% | 68.3% | +9.9% |
| Floodpits Drowner | Creature — Merfolk | 2 | 12 | 76.8% | 68.9% | +8.0% |
| Enduring Curiosity | Enchantment Creature — Cat Glimmer | 4 | 11 | 73.6% | 67.8% | +5.8% |
| Overlord of the Balemurk | Enchantment Creature — Avatar Horror | 5 | 8 | 71.2% | 66.0% | +5.1% |
| Elspeth's Smite | Instant | 1 | 23 | 72.9% | 68.0% | +4.9% |
| Sunpearl Kirin | Creature — Kirin | 2 | 47 | 73.0% | 68.3% | +4.7% |
| Spyglass Siren | Creature — Siren Pirate | 1 | 11 | 73.6% | 69.2% | +4.4% |
| Obstinate Baloth | Creature — Beast | 4 | 12 | 72.0% | 68.1% | +3.9% |
| Boon-Bringer Valkyrie | Creature — Angel Warrior | 5 | 9 | 74.1% | 70.6% | +3.6% |
| Spiteful Hexmage | Creature — Human Warlock | 1 | 34 | 70.3% | 67.1% | +3.2% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Esper Pixie | 1058 | 68.4% | 54.8% |
| Azorius Control | 361 | 98.6% | 51.5% |
| Jeskai Oculus | 66 | 25.6% | 65.9% |
| Azorius Glyph | 52 | 45.2% | 44.7% |
| Azorius Flash | 52 | 23.1% | 61.2% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.